Functional testing
Check account creation, sign-in, navigation, forms, payments or other agreed core tasks against the expected behaviour.
Testing services / Mobile app QA
Test the user journeys that matter, find reproducible bugs and give your development team a clearer path to the next release.
Plan a QA reviewSend us your build, key features and release date. We agree the user journeys and available Android devices to cover, then test those flows and report reproducible issues with clear steps and supporting evidence where included.
Need a check after fixes? We can include an agreed retest in your quote. For a Google Play participant group, see closed-testing support; for a focused QA review, tell us what you need checked.
A useful QA review starts with what the app is meant to do. We agree the build, features, test accounts and device coverage before work begins. The scope can support a first Android release, an upcoming update, a beta test or a focused check after fixes.
This is different from simply adding app testers. The goal is to exercise real workflows, describe failures clearly and return findings your team can act on.
Check account creation, sign-in, navigation, forms, payments or other agreed core tasks against the expected behaviour.
Record steps to reproduce an issue, the expected result, the actual result, and relevant build or device details.
Review whether important actions are easy to understand, complete and recover from when something goes wrong.
Check the agreed Android devices, screen sizes, orientation and system settings available within the project scope.
Repeat specific journeys after a fix when retesting is included in your written scope.
For games, the test plan can cover onboarding, controls, progression, save state, rewards and other agreed gameplay flows.
Each reported problem should identify the build and test environment, explain the actions taken and show what happened. Screenshots or recordings are supporting evidence; they are most useful when paired with context.
REPORT PREVIEW · ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE
This demonstration shows how a finding can be documented. It is not a customer report or a result from a tested app.
| Environment | Demo build 1.0 · Android 14 · Pixel 7 (illustrative) |
|---|---|
| Starting state | A signed-in test account with an existing draft. |
| Reproduce | Open the draft, change its title, tap Save, leave the screen and reopen it. |
| Expected | The updated title is still shown. |
| Observed in this example | The old title returns despite a success message. |
| Impact | The user cannot reliably update a saved draft. |
| Evidence to attach | A recording of the steps, with private details removed. |
| Retest status | Pending a new build. Repeat the same steps when the fix is ready. |
Device coverage, evidence and retests depend on your agreed scope. Download the blank bug-report template or request a QA plan for your app.
They solve related but different problems. Mobile app QA focuses on functionality, usability and bugs. Google Play closed testing focuses on coordinating eligible testers through the required testing period and collecting feedback for the production-access process.
You can book either service or agree a combined scope. A QA review alone does not complete a required Google Play testing period.
Explore Google Play closed testing| Area | Details to confirm |
|---|---|
| Coverage | Features, user journeys, build version, Android versions and available devices. |
| Access | A working test build, instructions and dedicated accounts with safe test data. |
| Delivery | Bug-report format, evidence, timing, price and any retesting. |
| Boundaries | Code fixes, security audits, automation and load testing are separate unless explicitly included. |
Preparing your own test plan? Use the Android app testing checklist.